Factor maps and invariant sub-σ-algebras #
A factor map (or morphism of measure-preserving systems) from a system (α, T, μ) to a
system (β, S, ν) is a measure-preserving map π : α → β that intertwines the two dynamics,
π ∘ T = S ∘ π. This file packages that data as Oseledets.Entropy.IsFactorMap and proves the
basic correspondence between factor maps and invariant sub-σ-algebras of the source: the
σ-algebra comap π 𝓑 pulled back from the target is invariant under T, in the sense that
pulling it back once more along T only shrinks it (comap T (comap π 𝓑) ≤ comap π 𝓑). This is
exactly the hypothesis comap T 𝒜 ≤ 𝒜 consumed by the Kolmogorov–Sinai entropy machinery, so
the lemma feeds a factor system into the conditional-entropy / relative-entropy toolbox.
Design note: the intertwining is an everywhere equality #
The defining intertwining relation is stated as the honest pointwise equality π ∘ T = S ∘ π,
not merely the almost-everywhere relation π ∘ T =ᵐ[μ] S ∘ π. This is deliberate and
mathematically standard (Walters, Ch. 4: a factor map is a morphism of dynamical systems, hence
genuinely commutes with the dynamics). It is also necessary for the correspondence lemma:
MeasurableSpace.comap is an everywhere construction on preimages, and an almost-everywhere
equality of functions does not in general yield equality of the comap σ-algebras. With the
everywhere identity, the key lemma is a clean rewrite by MeasurableSpace.comap_comp followed by
MeasurableSpace.comap_mono.
A second, equally standard part of the morphism data is that the target dynamics S is itself
measurable; this is what supplies the σ-algebra contraction comap S 𝓑 ≤ 𝓑 driving the
correspondence lemma.
Main definitions #
Oseledets.Entropy.IsFactorMap:π : α → βis a factor map from(α, T, μ)to(β, S, ν)when it is measure preserving, the target mapSis measurable, and it intertwines the dynamics,π ∘ T = S ∘ π.
Main results #
Oseledets.Entropy.IsFactorMap.invariant_comap: the pulled-back σ-algebracomap π 𝓑isT-invariant,comap T (comap π 𝓑) ≤ comap π 𝓑— the hypothesis the entropy machinery needs.Oseledets.Entropy.IsFactorMap.measurable_comap_le:comap π 𝓑is a genuine sub-σ-algebra of the source measurable structure.
References #
- Peter Walters, An Introduction to Ergodic Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 79, Springer (1982), Ch. 4.
π : α → β is a factor map from the measure-preserving system (α, T, μ) to the system
(β, S, ν) when it pushes μ forward to ν, the target dynamics S is measurable, and π
intertwines the dynamics, π ∘ T = S ∘ π.
The intertwining is required as an everywhere equality (not only =ᵐ[μ]): a factor map is a
morphism of dynamical systems, and the everywhere identity is what makes the pulled-back
σ-algebra genuinely invariant. Measurability of S is part of the data of a morphism of
measurable dynamical systems and is exactly what makes comap S 𝓑 ≤ 𝓑, the contraction used in
the correspondence lemma below.
Equations
- Oseledets.Entropy.IsFactorMap π T S μ ν = (MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving π μ ν ∧ Measurable S ∧ π ∘ T = S ∘ π)
Instances For
The σ-algebra comap π 𝓑 pulled back from the target along a factor map is invariant under
the source dynamics T: pulling it back once more along T only shrinks it. This is precisely
the comap T 𝒜 ≤ 𝒜 hypothesis required by the Kolmogorov–Sinai entropy machinery.
The proof rewrites comap T (comap π 𝓑) = comap (π ∘ T) 𝓑 = comap (S ∘ π) 𝓑 = comap π (comap S 𝓑)
using the everywhere intertwining π ∘ T = S ∘ π, then applies comap_mono to the contraction
comap S 𝓑 ≤ 𝓑, which is the measurability of S.
The pulled-back σ-algebra comap π 𝓑 of a factor map is a genuine sub-σ-algebra of the
source measurable structure, since the measure-preserving π is in particular measurable.